As Stafford County prepares its fiscal plan for 2026, officials are bracing for both financial opportunities and challenges. Expected increases in education funding and mounting concerns over the rising costs of tax exemptions for disabled veterans are heating up budget discussions among county leaders.

This article is exclusively for our Locals Only members. Please Sign In or upgrade to become a Locals Only Member today!

Your support helps us continue delivering more in-depth community news that matters to you.

Stafford County has appointed Eugene Loew as its new Director of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism, bringing over two decades of experience in public recreation and leisure services. Loew joins the county from Prince William County, where he served as the Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation.

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or create a FREE account today. Make the smart choice for staying informed about your community. Thank you!

Stafford County’s Board of Supervisors will hold its next meeting today, Tuesday, February 18, at 5 p.m. The meeting will be streamed live, and the agenda will be posted online.

Here’s a sample of what’s on the agenda today:

Bylaws Change for Board Appointments 

The board will review proposed changes to the bylaws to formalize the appointment and removal process of members on Boards, Authorities, Committees, and Commissions (BACC). The proposed changes follow the recent controversial removal of a library board member and the board’s subsequent censure of Supervisor Monica Gary.

Data Centers

There are currently several data center rezoning applications for centers throughout Stafford. A few are listed below:

• Potomac Creek Campus: Falmouth District, near Potomac Creek Drive, south of Eskimo Hill Road
• Accocreek Center: Falmouth District, near Richmond Highway and Eskimo Hill Road
• GWV Data Center: Hartwood District, Ramoth Church Road across from Centreport Parkway
• Austin Ridge Logistics: Hartwood District, Cedar Lane near Courthouse Road
• Enon Road Tech: Hartwood District, Enon Road near Wyatt Lane
• Cranes Corner: Falmouth District, Richmond Highway near Centreport Parkway

In 2023, the Board amended the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan to define data centers, establish development standards, and specify permitted zoning districts. Data centers were allowed by-right in the M-2 zoning district and the ICTP overlay district.

Now, the Board is considering a new amendment requiring a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for data centers in the M-2 district instead of allowing them by-right. CUPs allow for case-by-case review to assess factors such as traffic, environmental impact, noise, and infrastructure needs.

A new ordinance amendment (O25-08) has been proposed, and the Board has referred it to the Planning Commission. A joint public hearing is scheduled for March 18, 2025, to discuss the changes. Data centers would still be permitted by-right in the ICTP district, though no parcels currently have this designation.

Fredericksburg recently gathered attention for an aggressive timeline in pursuing data center development in the city.

Wetlands Board

Resolution R25-49 proposes restructuring the Wetlands Board/Coastal Primary Sand Dunes Board and Chesapeake Bay Board to include seven members with election district designations and up to three alternates. The resolution also establishes staggered initial terms, with subsequent terms set at five years. This change aligns with state law, which requires the county to maintain these boards for regulatory oversight. The Wetlands Board also serves as the Coastal Primary Sand Dunes Board, and its members make up the Chesapeake Bay Board. The modifications aim to ensure compliance with state membership and term-staggering requirements.

Lake Carroll Dam Update

Due to lack of maintenance over the last 20 years, the Kennedy Dam at Lake Carroll is in need of maintenance before regulatory improvements can be done. Legislation was passed 10 years ago that required modification to many dams throughout the state. The board previously approved a loan that was designated towards regulatory improvements and did not include the maintenance needs.

The project also faces constraints on when trees can be cleared due to regulations around an endangered long-eared bat which resides in the area. Trees can only be cleared between November and April, which will create additional hurdles with construction bids and the duration of the work. There is also concern that the project will exceed the funds available if there are any delays or unexpected developments.

Campgrounds

Currently, campgrounds are permitted by-right in the A-1, Agricultural zoning district on at least 10 acres, with no special county regulations. However, state regulations govern campgrounds through the Virginia Department of Health, covering permits, density, utilities, and construction standards.

Staff reviewed campground regulations in other localities and found that most require a special exception or use permit. Only Fauquier County has adopted specific campground regulations. A regional analysis was conducted to assess campground facilities, amenities, and potential impacts.

Based on this analysis, staff recommends requiring a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for campgrounds in the A-1 district, updating campground-related definitions in the Zoning Ordinance, and considering whether to allow campgrounds as a CUP use in other zoning districts. A draft ordinance amendment (O25-07) has been prepared for review.

The proposed Belle Plains Campground generated significant opposition from neighbors, but was allowed by right.

The Stafford County Board of Supervisors will vote on significant changes to its bylaws governing appointments to local and regional boards and commissions during its meeting at 5 p.m. on Tuesday, February 18, 2025.

This article is exclusively for our Locals Only members. Please Sign In or upgrade to become a Locals Only Member today!

Your support helps us continue delivering more in-depth community news that matters to you.

The Stafford County Board of Supervisors is considering a zero-tax-increase budget for 2025, which has drawn community members' support and concern. During the February 4, 2025, meeting, parents and education advocates urged the board to fund Stafford County Public Schools (SCPS) fully, emphasizing the need for higher teacher salaries, facility repairs, and student resources.

This article is FREE to read. Please Sign In or Create a FREE Account. Thank you.

The Stafford County Board of Supervisors has appointed Dr. Janet L. S. Brown-Page to the Central Rappahannock Regional Library Board of Trustees as the citizen representative for Stafford County. She replaces Mary Becelia, who was removed from the board in 2024.

Brown-Page brings experience in human and community relations, having served as a senior manager at the director level within the federal government. She is the President and CEO of JB Associates Enterprise International, LLC, providing mediation, individual and family coaching, and court-ordered co-parenting classes. Additionally, she is a Virginia Supreme Court Certified Mediator/Mentor in multiple court systems, including General District, Circuit, and Juvenile and Domestic Relations Courts.

Her appointment follows the removal of Becelia from the Library Board in a controversial decision that resulted in the formal censure of Stafford County Supervisor Monica Gary. On December 17, 2024, the Board of Supervisors censured Gary by a 5-0 vote with one abstention, citing misleading information that led to Becelia’s removal and violations of the board’s Code of Performance.

Gary was stripped of all board assignments and committee appointments, with the censure resolution alleging her actions were politically motivated in an effort to gain support from the Stafford Democratic Committee for her 2025 re-election bid. Gary, who initially ran as an independent, has since announced that she will not seek re-election when her term ends on December 31, 2025.

Brown-Page’s qualifications extend beyond her mediation work. She holds a Ph.D. in Adult and Continuing Education from Kansas State University, a Master of Social Work (MSW) from the University of Hawaii, and undergraduate degrees in Psychology and Sociology from Alabama State University. She is also a credentialed professional coach from the International Coaching Federation (ICF) and has previously worked as a Mental Health Therapist for Fairfax County’s in-patient treatment program.

A community leader, Brown-Page is involved with the Rappahannock Fredericksburg Rotary Club and has served as the Past District Governor for Rotary District 7610, which covers Northern Virginia, the Northern Neck, and Charlottesville. She was awarded the Rotary International Service Above Self award, given to only 72 individuals worldwide for exemplary service. Her community outreach includes participation in the Fredericksburg Alumni Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc., and Oak Grove Baptist Church in Stafford, where she serves as a Deaconess.

Brown-Page, the eldest daughter of Rev. Dr. B.J. Simms—who played a key role in the Montgomery Bus Boycott—continues her family’s legacy of service. She resides in North Stafford with her husband.

The Central Rappahannock Regional Library (CRRL) Board of Trustees comprises dedicated community members appointed by their respective jurisdictions to represent and advocate for their communities. The Board includes representatives from Fredericksburg and the counties of Spotsylvania, Stafford, and Westmoreland.

The current members of the Board are:

• David Ross (Chair) – Spotsylvania County
• Christy Maupin (Vice Chair) – Westmoreland County
• Kerry Devine – City of Fredericksburg
• Cheryl Miller – City of Fredericksburg
• Lori Hayes – Spotsylvania County
• Pamela Yeung – Stafford County

These trustees collaborate with the CRRL’s Executive Director to establish library policies, adopt budgets, and support library-related legislation at both state and national levels. They also promote the library’s services, programs, and events within their communities.

The Prince William Board of County Supervisors voted Tuesday to cancel the long-debated Route 28 Bypass Project, ending years of planning and millions of dollars in studies and design work. The decision, which passed with a 5-3 vote, came after a contentious debate over the feasibility and cost of the project.

Initially estimated to cost more than $200 million, the road would have connected with Route 28 at a signalized intersection north of Bull Run Stream in Fairfax County. The plan to build the road, Alternative 2B, was the top recommendation from the 2017 Route 28 Corridor Feasibility Study. The project had received $89 million in funding from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) as part of a broader effort to improve the county’s transportation infrastructure.

County transportation director Rick Canizales confirmed that the estimated cost had grown beyond available funding, requiring an additional $80–$100 million to proceed. “After taking all this into consideration and doing all the design work that we’ve done at this point, we come to the board and let you know that as staff, we believe that alternative 2B is not viable because we don’t have enough money and we don’t have enough support in some of the challenges we’re facing,” Canizales said.

Fairfax County, a key stakeholder, did not commit to securing right-of-way approvals needed to move the project forward. “We’ve been trying tooth and nail to find an alignment and a price point that would work for this county… But I sit here wondering when that five and a half million dollars becomes $8 million, becomes $10 million, becomes $16 million just to get the project through design,” said Coles District Supervisor Yesli Vega, who led the charge to kill the project.

Divided Board, Heated Debate

Supervisors clashed over the decision, with some arguing that the project’s cancellation would leave commuters stranded without a straightforward solution to congestion. Vega, representing the district most impacted by the bypass, was vocal about her opposition to the cancellation. “What are we fighting for? Aside from everything that you stated, I’ll tell you what I’ve been fighting for for the past five years. I’ve been fighting for the people that live in these communities… Do we have a problem on Route 28? Yes, we do. Are we going to do something about it? Yes, we will. Because I gave my word that we would, and I’m a woman of my word, and we’re going to follow through on that,” Vega said.

Others supported the cancellation, citing financial realities and the lack of regional cooperation. Supervisor Bob Weir pointed to Fairfax County’s refusal to support the project, stating, “Is it not correct that Fairfax County, particularly Board of Supervisors Chairman Jeff McKay, has stalemated us for months, and we have been spinning our wheels?” Canizales confirmed that he had been discussing right-of-way issues with Fairfax officials for nearly three years without progress.

Occoquan Supervisor Kenny Boddye argued that the project had become an unsustainable financial burden, stating, “We have to find a mechanism for giving this project a hundred million more dollars to even say it’s fully funded to continue on with the project. And right now, neither the CIP nor the five-year plan have any kind of plan for that money.”

Woodbridge Supervisor Margaret Franklin acknowledged the lack of viable alternatives but noted that either way, taxpayers would be footing the bill. “I just want to point out that if we’re canceling the project, we’re going to have to pay out-of-pocket likely for another project. And if we keep the project, you’re saying that we still have to come out-of-pocket. So I just want to be clear that either way, we’re coming out-of-pocket,” she said.

Brentsville Supervisor Tom Gordy also frustrated with regional politics, stating, “Regionalism really doesn’t work here. There are those that have, and then there are those that have not. And those that have wanted to continue to hold those of us who have not under their thumb. And this is a perfect example of that.”

Franklin, Angry, and Bailey voted to keep it, while Vega, Gordy, Boddye, and Chair At-large Deshundra Jefferson voted to kill it.

What’s Next for Route 28?

With the cancellation of the bypass, county officials are now looking at alternative solutions to address congestion along Route 28. One option under consideration is widening the existing roadway, though officials acknowledge that this project would also require significant funding and would need to be evaluated by the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) for regional funding eligibility.

Despite the board’s decision, the county must now negotiate the financial closeout of the project with NVTA, which had allocated $89 million in funding. Approximately $5.9 million of those funds had already been spent on design and environmental studies and will need to be repaid. The remaining funds will return to NVTA’s regional pool, where Prince William County must compete for future transportation funding.

Residents and local business owners who have long relied on Route 28 for their daily commutes remain concerned about what comes next. “Something needs to be done,” said Vega. “I gave my word that we would, and I’m a woman of my word. We’re going to follow through on that.”

The board is expected to discuss alternative plans in upcoming meetings, focusing on securing funding for a new congestion relief strategy.

Stafford County’s Board of Supervisors will hold its next meeting today, Tuesday, February 4, at 5 p.m. The meeting will be streamed live, and the agenda will be posted online.

Here’s a sample of what’s on the agenda today:

Transportation

A petition to have VDOT accept several roads into the state highway system: Decatur Road, Quarry Road, and Winding Creek’s Rotunda Way, Elmsley Lane, Driscoll Lane, Mountain Path Lane, Grisham Road, and Pima Court. These roads have been reviewed by VDOT and County staff and determined to be eligible for the State Highway System.

In Stafford County, public streets are usually built as part of an approved subdivision or development plan. Both VDOT and County staff monitor the construction, with VDOT having more control. The developer is responsible for building and maintaining the streets until they meet all VDOT requirements. Once the streets meet those standards and there are enough homes on them, VDOT will take over responsibility for maintenance and add the streets to the public highway system.

Planning Commission

The board will vote on approving the Planning Commissions annual report for activities in 2024.  The planning commission held 12 regular meetings and 31 public hearings in 2024. In 2023, they met 27 times.

11 public hearings were held for zoning reclassifications. This included changes for properties like Belmont Park, Clift Farm, Jackson Historic District, Stafford Technology Campus, and several others. 10 public hearings were held for Conditional Use Permits, with some applications also involving zoning reclassifications. The projects included Sheetz at Warrenton Road, Aquia Town Center Starbucks, two new elementary schools, Vulcan Concrete, and more.

Planning Commissioners also serve as members or liaisons to other boards and commissions. They are part of the Technical Review Committee (TRC), which meets when needed by the applicant or the County. This year, two TRC meetings were held, including projects for Belle Plains Campground and Cool Spring Self Storage Revision, attended by Commissioner Caudill.

The report also says the Planning Commission reviewed one residential subdivision, the Mainline subdivision, which was approved for 114 townhouse lots. They also approved a preliminary site plan for the Rocky Run Village subdivision with 107 single-family lots and the Melrod commercial site plan for 4 data center buildings, totaling 948,200 square feet.

Elections

A proposal to authorize the County Administrator to purchase electronic pollbooks at an initial cost of $226,420, with $25,800 annual fees for license, maintenance and support. The current pollbooks are ending their lifetime use, and the company no longer supports the operating system.

Sheriff’s Office

The sheriff’s office received a $12,500 grant from Virginia State Police’s Help Eliminate Auto Theft (HEAT) program. The sheriff is requesting the board approve the use of that grant for an automated license plate reader software. The proposal states the automated license reader will integrate with public safety programs like AMBER alerts and missing person investigations, in addition to improving the process of identifying stolen vehicles and apprehending suspects. The software would decrease the frequency of auto thefts in the county, according to the report.

The Stafford County Board of Supervisors is progressing toward finalizing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Economic Development Authority (EDA) and the Department of Economic Development.

The draft MOU aims to clarify the roles and responsibilities of both entities in promoting economic growth and business attraction within the county. However, concerns raised by some Board members suggest that the document may need further refinement before it can be adopted.

During a work session on January 28, 2025, Liz Barber, the county’s Director of Economic Development, presented the draft MOU, highlighting the extensive process that led to its creation. The document was developed over the past year, with input from both county administration and EDA members. Its goal is to establish clear guidelines and expectations for the EDA and the Department of Economic Development, particularly regarding the administrative processes, division of duties, and collaboration between the two bodies.

The EDA has seven members who assist the Board of Supervisors in attracting and financing industry and commerce to the community.

Most recently, the EDA was instrumental in hammering out a performance agreement with Amazon Web Services for the Old Potomac Church Data Center Site. Barber explained that whenever the Board approves an incentive agreement of Supervisors, the EDA serves as the conduit for reimbursing agreed-upon fees after the project completes certain milestones. These milestones ensure the necessary capital and infrastructure improvements are made. Without the EDA, Stafford County could not offer competitive incentives to secure essential projects like the AWS data center.

It was also active in the Stafford Germanna Community College expansion by contributing $750,000 toward the newly opened Stafford location for Germanna Community College.

The MOU outlines key responsibilities, including financial procedures such as access to EDA bank accounts, passwords, and loan underwriting processes. Barber emphasized that the document was designed to provide stability and consistency, ensuring that regardless of staff changes or leadership transitions, the roles and responsibilities of both entities remain clear. As Barber explained in a recent communication, the lack of an MOU to date has created challenges, and this new document will formalize existing operational guidelines that both entities have been following informally.

“There is no MOU in place to date, prompting the need and interest in having one to go forward,” Barber said. “The interest in generating this document is likely driven by the desire to create consistency, which will alleviate confusion as new staff, elected officials, and EDA members come and go through the years.”

However, Board members voiced concerns over the document’s alignment with the county’s strategic goals. Supervisor Pamela Yeung, for instance, questioned whether the MOU sufficiently reflects the county’s vision for economic development, especially in light of the upcoming strategic plan being developed. Yeung noted that the EDA’s strategic plan is waiting to be updated, and she expressed reluctance to move forward with the MOU until there is more clarity about how both entities’ strategic goals will align.

“I just feel that when reading through it, I saw a reference to staff, and I wasn’t sure who the staff was. Was it the county staff, the ED staff, or county administration staff?” Yeung remarked. “Without the strategic plan, it’s hard for me to support this right now.”

Another concern some members, including Supervisor Darrell English, raised was the need for a more robust, long-term strategy to guide the county’s economic development efforts. While the MOU establishes basic administrative procedures, questions remain about the direction of business incentives, the role of the EDA in site development, and how both entities can work together to attract the types of businesses that align with Stafford’s growth goals.

“I feel like we need more than just administrative guidelines,” English said. “We need something that will help define the county’s approach to business development and create clear goals for the EDA.”

Barber responded by explaining that the MOU was intended to be an “evergreen” document capable of evolving with the county’s strategic goals. She emphasized that the Economic Development Department has been working closely with the EDA to ensure that both entities are aligned. However, further changes could be made as the county’s strategic plan is finalized.

Despite the concerns, Barber expressed confidence that the MOU, once approved, will provide a clear framework for the future. “This is about creating guardrails for us to work together effectively,” she explained. “It’s important that we move forward with a solid foundation, even as we continue to refine our goals.”

In the coming weeks, the Board will continue to discuss the MOU’s details and ensure they align with the county’s strategic goals and the evolving role of the EDA. Supervisors also emphasized the importance of revisiting the MOU regularly to adapt to changing economic conditions and ensure the county’s economic development efforts remain dynamic and effective.